BrowserStack Reviews

It is a perfect application for web application testing. It has so many options. It is a one place solution.

Mobile application testing is little challenging as sometimes it is working perfectly on BrowserStack but not on real device. Also 2nd con what I observed is the pricing which is bit higher side.

UI is very initiative, and ux us very sumple

performance especcialy on videos and controls buttons

Large matrix of operating systems and browsers (all different versions, too) that can be used manually or automated for testing and regression testing.

Slightly complicated UI to setup your tests. Once your tests are setup, they are run automatically - and that works great.

It is a very mature system with a lot of powerful features.

Due to the age of the architecture, there are performance issues. And the approach requiring multiple IP addresses which needed to be white listed, and constantly changed were a major nuisance.

Its very User Friendly. We can use all Current Windows and Mac OS with so many combination of resolution. And mostly all majorly used iOS and Android devices also available. Bug Raising we can take Screenshot and inbuild we can raise issues.

Some of the Features are not available in Browser Stack like Drag and Drop Functionality for Devices, Some of the Pointer functionality will not work in Browserstack.

BrowserStack has strong after sales support and continuously evolving as per trends and bringing the features needed for QA community.

They can improve on boot time for Real Mobile devices for enhanced customer experience and Network Logs analyser could be better as compared to other product offerings.

Test Management
Low Code Automation
Cross Browser testing
Its very easy to use and we can get help anytime from Support team on any queries

We can still improve upon statuses mentioned in Test Management

Reliable platform and using real devices

Offshore servers causing the problem since you don't know on which server you will be executing the test. Lack of customer support

I have been utilizing Browserstack for the past four years and have been consistently impressed with the comprehensive suite of modules it offers. The Live module, in particular, has proven to be an invaluable asset, enabling me to effectively address my clients' needs. Furthermore, the robust security measures implemented by Browserstack instill confidence in my clients, ensuring the utmost privacy and protection of sensitive data.

I have not yet identified any vulnerabilities yet.

Wide range of mobile devices and browsers will help to cover manual and automation testing easily.

Latest devices with OS updates are launching immediately helping teams to check apps up to date.

Developer options and logs helping dev team to check the issues with ease.

Network stimulation,Locale testing etc features helps team to mimic real user scenarios easily.

The apps for testing can Integrate easily by uploading or integration with appecenter or other platforms.

A proper stable network connection is must .Otherwise will feel laggy and will not get a smoother experience.

There are restrictions is accessing the settings menu for phones.So making changes from settings level and testing will be difficult.

Each time all the sessions will get reset.So will not get a continuous testing experience it may take more time to start from the scratch some times.

1) Vast variety of devices, major plus
2) User friendly UI
3) Easy way to upload binaries for testing

1) Most times, when I upload APKs, they dont run. Keep getting errors

When you work in web development, it's a necessary task to be able to view the websites you design on multiple formats such as phones, tablets, etc. Browserstack allows you to do this in one easy to use interface.

Occasionally, it takes some time for a specific version/phone model to load up to be ready to preview or it can get stuck.

Easy to use, fast and excellent customer service. The QA, Dev, Product and UX teams all like this tool.

Not really anything, however it would be great to have an ability to choose a trial when needed and pause rather than a defined 1 week window.

Extensive Browser and Device Coverage
Real Devices
Live Testing
Integrations

I love Browserstack for it's ease of use and no fighting over sessions for a particular device like other rival companies. It's always available and performance is good on at least 80% of devices and desktop browsers.

There are some performance issues with some desktop browsers like Mac, and some devices but most work flawlessly. I wish we had an option for multitaps.

The Test Runs are well done, organized and contains a lot of good data available to track the progress of the run.

There are some things that could be improved on Test Management, like a button for copying a test case to the same folder and the possibility to drag and drop folders to reorganize the structure. There is also a few bugs, like when you click on edit folder name and select the current name using the cursor and the pop up window closes.

Increasing our device coverage as there are a lot of devices available which are mostly used by our customers , so we don't have to buy physical devices for our team anymore

The document link should be there. Example - Integration section should have steps how to proceed with the connection.

Usability is very good and user-friendly.

Sometimes devices lag and become very slow.