GitHub Reviews

GitHub provides a single service where source code control, documentation, issue tracking, and more are possible. All of these aspects are well integrated and can even reference lines from the source from different commits. Pricing for academics is extremely generous.

There's not much to not like in GitHub. It does a lot of things well. Some little things can be improved like better user administration and creating a way for users to sign-up for your organization rather than inviting a user to join your organization.

There are so many features in Github. I am currently using the Student package which I got through GitHub Education. The best thing I experienced was the support being given to the students. This is very useful for managing the project and its source code. Also, I liked the GITHUB PAGES feature most because of the Ease of Deployment. After uploading the files and creating a repository, we can directly deploy the project in a few clicks.

I liked everything on the platform, their UI, features, support tutorials, etc. There is no such thing that I hate or dislike. There are no ads or stuff like that. Yeah.

The simplicity and ease of use for our development team is a win for us. Controlling access and creating updates to our proprietary source code is a breeze with Github. it allows us to streamline our workflow and operate in a more controlled and error free way.

Sometimes the code it suggests is not always accurate for our company's needs. So a bit of trial and error is needed sometimes.

VCS and it's being free for all basic needs, from the smallest firms to IT behemoths, everyone uses GitHub.

the learning curve may seem steep if someone wants to do advance pull requests and forking.

Github requires no introduction. It is the most popular source code management among opensouce and enterprise customers. It has native integration with almost all cloud providers.

Charge per user. In our case we outsource 70% of our development to outside contractors. Every time we add them into our account, it is considered as additional collaborator and takes away one seat. It will be hard for us to keep monitoring both internal and external developers on our team to keep the cost under control.

Very easy to host a repository and to fork other repositories. It is easy to search other repositories.

None that I found. My only request would be to be easier to download single files without having to view the file first. If there were checkboxes and a download option that would be great.

GitHub makes managing Git repos a lot easier by providing a fantastic UI and a solid infrastructure. I also love the Package Registry service which fast, reliable, quick to set up and use, and has a fair pricing plan.

There is very little to dislike about GitHub. I'd like to see more work towards code monetization (for instance by creating a unified platform that takes care of licensing and payments)

There are some key features that makes GitHub a great tool for version control. In the first place all the process of having control over branches setting permissions and the vast options for configuration in the repository you have are great. It has one of the best pull request section, it allows for commenting more than one line which is great for making comments. As well GitHub have integrated great tools like the pipelines we can create to have continuos integration.

Some time for me GitHub has been built without an intuitive UI and checking even the smallest and easiest thing like a date you need to hover over another date to tell you the complete hour and time of a commit per say. So this kind of stuff makes GitHub sometimes difficult for new joiners of the software but as you get to use it more.

Since GitHub relies on Git underneath, one can be assured that it uses a strong, open source system behind the scenes. It integrates so well with the command-line that it's the main way I interact with GitHub on a daily basis. All essential actions you may need to perform are also available in the graphical interface on GitHub, making for a convenient experience when on the move as all necessary tools can be accessed either way. It offers security features such as the ability to link SSH and GPG keys, allowing users to verify their commits and secure their identity. The two-factor authentication system is also impressively well thought-out, having various recovery options including security keys, SMS number, recovery tokens, recovery codes and even fallback SMS number. If you often write the same content in form of comments, there is even a feature to have "saved replies", speeding up the interaction process for recurring matters. GitHub is also extremely accessible, offering unlimited private repositories for personal use. Even open source organizations can benefit tremendously without having to spend a dime as it includes by default everything one can need. GitHub is also perfect for students, giving you access to pro features and discounts through their "Student Developer Pack". GitHub Pages is another fantastic aspect of the platform, allowing you to host a website without any hassle, with really quick build time while also ranking very high on search engines.

Even though all members in a specific organization on GitHub may prove they are all verified students, there is still the need for the educational institution to set up a few steps on their own to approve changes being made, which slows down considerably the initial setup. The search options, although they are powerful, aren't very intuitive and many useful functions are well hidden in the documentation pages. As a regular user, there is no option to freely start collaborating in private repositories before scaling up, which is a feature that's often available on other similar platforms. On that note, the price tag for GitHub is relatively high for the added benefits compared to other solutions. There is a restriction on file size, which cannot exceed 100 Mb. In most instances, this is not an inconvenient, but it will not be an appropriate platform to handle sharing large files when rendering 3D models for example.

GitHub is home to the majority of the web's open source projects. It was one of the first version control services and it aged pretty well.
The service's website speed is probably one of the best around when it comes to repository hosting services and this is very important as through the website all the information about projects can be found.
There is a lot of searching and navigating to be done within projects so the speed is a big plus.

GitHub also has it's own website hosting service called GitHub Pages which allows people to make their own website. This is great if you are the project owner and would like to link additional information within a look that looks less than a wiki page.

GitHub comes with a very easy to use desktop application which is used to manage repositories, both from GitHub as well as the competition's services.

Being so popular it has a great deal of integrations into other services, the most important one for me perosnally being the Heroku and the Netlify one. Whatever is pushed to the GitHub repo gets built and sent to Heroku and Netlify. saving up valuable time. These integrations are sometimes available for the competition services too but the steps are much steeper.

Another thing that GitHub done right was the monthly progress on the main page showing how many changes were made by the user. This helped with giving people an incentive to keep working every day to have the calendar-like frame green at all times (gamification).

When I started using GitHub a long time ago (~6 years) the services was very limited if you were a free user. The collaborators were limited and the space was very tiny and on top of everything your projects were not private. This is great for open source developers but for me, I could not allow myself to put game projects up for grabs so I mostly used GitHub for small prototypes.
Late came the option for free users to have private repositories and after that Microsoft bought GitHub extending the limitations.

Unfortunately even with their newest addition to the space of a repository using Large File Storage (LFS), the competition offers more space and a more streamlined workflow for big projects. Also a lot of features are behind a paywall for GitHub while the competition gives them for free, at a cost of slower website speed however.

Knowing git and GitHub boosted the productivity of my team members and I. We were able to cutback on the times we were doing manual version control work rather than actual software development. It has been very useful to the point that it has been integrated into our project work pipeline. It has been very reliable and our team has never encountered problems in uploading and retrieving the code of others. We are able to document any changes to our code and fix conflicting code which made working in a team much more convenient.

Our team of 3 uses the free version which allows us to collaborate with each other, set up a public or private repository, document our bugs, and manage our workflow which already is a lot for a free service. Paid options allow for collaboration of bigger teams, analytics, and other advanced features.

Aside from that, a GUI version of the application allows you to visually see the changes in the project and simplifies the workflow. Tutorials and documentations on how to use GitHub, for both the GUI and command line versions are available. Most source code editors now even have GitHub integrated and allows you to do the commands without leaving the editor.

As great as GitHub is, it really takes some time in getting used to, especially for beginners. It has a steep learning curve and you are most likely going to have to use a search engine for the tasks you want to do. GitHub also has an application with a GUI which is relatively beginner friendly, but even then, the Git workflow is really something that requires practice. I personally use the Command Line Interface and the difficult part is knowing the commands to use in which I solved by printing out a cheat sheet.

i found the following features as most impactful:
- version controlling
- dependabot for vulnerability scanning
- integrates well with third-party based app
- ability to go back to previous versions if present code shows error
- high repository privacy
Yes the product is quite easy to use for:
- hassle free source code hosting
- Container Registry quite helpful
- open-source community involvement fostering
- user interface is really smooth easy and Excellent
- open-source applications/code of all available to tweak
Yes i was successfully able to implement the integration of the app/software/SAAS with my existing business processes quite smoothly and easily as i could set it up with a little self-help, effort, and online training guides..

I found the following features that were either missing or could be improved:
- merger-conflicts through github could be improved
- pull request codeview could be improved
- no options for delete update and issues create for teams and users
- Like many other IDEs, the code editing environment features lacks in additional functionalities.

I found the following features or aspects of the product that are difficult to use:
- folder deletion
- absence of rich CI/CD
-one is  unable to install, download, as well as set up one's own GitHub server.
- permanent removal of unwanted files
- misleading repository contributions count
No, the integration of the app/software/SAAS with my existing business processes not so much difficult as i could set it up with a little self-help, effort, and online training guides.

Github has significantly altered the way I approach software development projects; I've been using it for a while now. It has been incredibly simple to collaborate with other developers and keep track of my code thanks to the version control feature. The tools for code review and issue tracking are particularly helpful because they make it simple to keep track of any bugs or adjustments that need to be made. Github also has a lot going for it in terms of open-source development. Numerous open-source projects have allowed me to participate and utilize them, and the supportive and welcoming community is always there to help. Building my portfolio and showcasing my work to potential employers has also been a great benefit. The ability to integrate with my continuous integration and deployment services, for example, was made possible by Github's integrations with other tools. I can manage the permissions of my project contributors with ease thanks to the access control feature. I also enjoy having access to my code from any location, and the remote backup feature gives me great peace of mind. I've looked over other developers' code on Github and contributed to their projects as a way to learn. All things considered, Github has become a crucial tool in my workflow, and I can't even imagine doing software development projects without it.

I've been using Github for a while, and while it has some great features, there are a few drawbacks as well that I've found annoying. First off, the price can be a little high, especially for private repositories or big teams. Larger projects may encounter difficulties due to the free plan's constrained storage. The navigation and interface can occasionally be a little bit perplexing to me. New users may find it overwhelming, and the customization options are few. Additionally, I've observed that some languages don't offer as strong support for code review and syntax highlighting tools. Github also doesn't seem to be designed for large enterprises, and it might not have the scalability options they require. Additionally, the fact that it is reliant on the service's uptime is somewhat of a drawback. Additionally, I discover that Github has a small number of integrations and that I am unable to locate the precise tools I require. Additionally, I don't have a lot of control over my privacy and data. Last but not least, I discover that it lacks integrated project management features, forcing me to rely on third-party tools. Although Github is a fantastic tool overall, some users may find its limitations to be infuriating.

Version control: GitHub provides a powerful version control system that allows developers to manage and track changes to their code over time.Collaboration: GitHub provides a range of collaboration tools, including pull requests, code reviews, and discussion forums, that make it easier for teams to work together on projects.Open-source community: GitHub is home to a large and active open-source community, making it easy for developers to find and contribute to projects, as well as access a wealth of resources and support.Integrations: GitHub integrates with a wide range of tools and services, including popular integrated development environments (IDEs), issue trackers, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) systems.Security: GitHub provides a range of security features, including two-factor authentication, encrypted communication, and the ability to encrypt sensitive data at rest.Large repository: GitHub hosts a massive repository of open-source projects, making it easier for developers to find and reuse code, as well as contribute their own projects to the community.Ease of use: GitHub has a user-friendly interface and is designed to be accessible to developers of all skill levels, making it easy for users to get started with version control and collaboration

Limited customization options: While GitHub provides a range of features and capabilities, some users may find that the customization options are limited, particularly for advanced users.Cost: For larger organizations or enterprises with many users, the cost of a GitHub Enterprise subscription can add up over time.Performance: Performance issues can arise when working with large repositories, particularly when many users are making changes at the same time.UI limitations: Some users may find the GitHub interface to be limited or confusing, and may prefer to use alternative Git clients or GUIs.Limited issue tracking: While GitHub provides basic issue tracking capabilities, some users may find that these are limited and prefer to use alternative issue tracking software.It's important to keep in mind that the limitations or drawbacks of GitHub may vary depending on the specific needs and requirements of the individual or organization. It's recommended to carefully evaluate their needs and compare the features offered by different platforms before making a decision.

Starting with versioning, ease of code management & collaboration, which is of utmost priority for any company that wants to develop code. GitHub provides it all.
They keep adding new features such as vulnerability scanning & integrations with IDE platforms like VScode. This makes GitHub even more reliable & convenient for coders.
Today, majority of coders will tell you to choose GitHub over any other platform given how much it has helped them & their company to develop code, continued with feature & bug management.

Merge conflict handling has improved since it was first implemented but there is still a lot of scope to make it easy for developers.
Code search is another feature I want GitHub to improve on, currently it does not allow to search for specific piece of logic inside a big repository until you take a pull & do it in your IDE

- I liked the version control system in GitHub, which allows for easy collaboration and tracking of changes made to the codebase.- I liked the integration with other tools and services, such as continuous integration and continuous deployment (CICD) systems, which allows for seamless integration of machine learning models into production environments.- I liked the community features such as finding and sharing code snippets and libraries, which can be incredibly useful for data scientists and machine learning engineers.- I found the software easy to use and navigate.- Integration with existing business processes was seamless.- The Access controls and Permissions feature was impactful as it allows for granular control over who can access and make changes to a project, which helps to ensure that only authorized users are able to make changes to the codebase.- The debugging feature was also impactful as it allows to see the history of changes and allows to revert back to previous versions if needed.- The task and project management features were also impactful as it allows developers to easily manage and track tasks and issues associated with a project, which can help to improve productivity and collaboration.

- One potential downside of GitHub is that it may have a steep learning curve for new users who are not familiar with version control systems.- Some users may find that the UI can be cluttered and overwhelming, making it difficult to find the specific features or options they need.- Some users may find that certain features or integrations are missing or could be improved, such as more advanced collaboration tools or better support for certain programming languages.- Some users may find that the cost of using GitHub's advanced features or integrations can be prohibitive for smaller or less well-funded projects.- There could be more customization options for the dashboard and reporting/project tracking feature.- For non-technical users, the interface may be challenging to understand.- The SSL security feature could be improved to provide better protection for private projects and data.- Some users may find that the bug tracking feature is not as robust as other issue tracking systems.