Bitbucket Reviews

It is deeply integrated with the Atlassian suite of tools which is convenient for using Jira alongside Bitbucket.

It is not as feature rich, significantly buggier and more difficult to use than its main competitors.

I could easily setup CI/CD pipelines using BitBucket Pipelines.

I found managing an organization on BitBucket quite difficult.

Bitbucket is excellent when integration with JIRA - it gives the team the ability to easily view status and get updates across systems. It also allows integration with the JIRA release and workflow tools

While Bitbucket is steadily being improved, it does lack a few features that it's main rival Github does. The Pull Release view is probably the main thing here - while it has many of the capabilities of Github, it just lacks some of the polish and ease of use features.

It is similar to Jira Attlasian, however better in terms of ticket management.

Two similar products from the same product company.
I use Jira, Bitbucket and Fisheye.
They all look similar.

It's in the Atlassian family, and as a Product Development leader already deeply immersed in mostly Atlassian products this has been a game changer. It's very user friendly, and not overwhelming to get new folks onboarded. It's clean and easy.

I wish we could have more permissions for structure with our developers. We do have the premium version which is absolutely fairly priced, I just wish it had a bit more control. Haha, but this could just be my opinion.

Working with Bitbucket is fairly straight forward and learning curve is pretty shallow. The most important part for our team was the self-hosted option for Bitbucket.

I enjoyed the UI and overall experience with GitHub a bit more, but I would not consider this a deciding factor when choosing appropriate version control system.

Easy-to-use UI and straightforward features to manage a repository for big projects spread over multiple team members

Bitbucket works just apt as per the requirements so does not seem to be problematic.

It is a great productRepositories are organised and managed easilyAccess control is done easily ( can create groups and provide specific acces and later add users to these groups)Branching is availableCan be used for issue tracking and integration with JiraPIpelines and deployments can also be set up

Nothing to dislike about bitbucketWe use the managed service by Atlassian

- can allow access over VPN- integration with Jira- source controll- pipeline

- slow load- no cross pipeline- no code highlights on pr review

Easy to set up repos and good enough permission management for users. Easy to organise repos into "directories".

The Pull request experience isn't great, especially for longer-lived pull requests with a large amount of files. I hear batched comments to PRs were added recently, so that's a step in the right direction.

Bitbucket is like other code management platforms. However, its interface is intuitive and easy to use. It also integrates with Jira and Confluence which makes it easy to manage documentation and tasks.

There is nothing to highlight negatively. Like all these tools, they are not easy to use. However, the interface is well designed and if you have ever used a similar platform, the adaptation will be fast. As the only element, its cost, can be high in relation to the competition.

I used Bitbucket because of its integration with Jira, which also provides easier source code management and easier version control to manage the CI/CD.

I think for its purpose and uses, I don't have anything that I didn't like about it.

It makes it very easy to see the entirety of a project source code at a glance.

Nothing to speak of, it is easy to use and manage.

Remote hosting, nice and sleek U.I, simple collaborative functions such as permissions and a history tab to compare between branches

Limited integrations, and the pricing if you're looking into a repository for a project.

Bit Bucket integrates almost seamlessly with Jira. It should be on the same bill and invoice but it's not.

It should be better integrated with Jira from a billing and management point of view. I'm not a dev but our developers prefer to use Git.

Relatively easy to setup, great access controls and does what it is supposed to, well.

Nothing that I can think of, not sure there is much you could add?

Its easy to merge builds and have own branches
Find bugs faster
Easy to discuss code changes

Integration issues with other platforms
Occasional outages

We had a development in which I had to control de designer which was located in another place so after his deployments I has to validate everything.

I liked it, i cannot say any con, at the beginning of the project was kind of confuse, but after few days was good.

I enjoyed working with bitbucket and Google Cloud platform

I hope the documentation on bitkucket will be more extensive