--- description: If you're in a hunt for the best solution for your business, learn what TestMu AI has to offer thanks to GetApp Singapore. We provide the most detailed information on pricing, benefits, and disadvantages of software. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: TestMu AI Price, Reviews & Ratings | GetApp Singapore 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Automation Testing Tools](/directory/389/testing/software) > [TestMu AI](/software/111387/lambdatest) # TestMu AI Canonical: https://www.getapp.sg/software/111387/lambdatest Page: 1 / 23\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.sg/software/111387/lambdatest?page=2) > The Native AI-Agentic Cloud Platform to Supercharge Quality Engineering. Test intelligently and ship faster. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 544 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Key benefits of TestMu AI Selenium Web Testing Automation Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing Faster Automated Screenshot Testing Scroll Sync to test two devices simultaneously using LT browser app Parallel Testing For Faster Goto Market Launch API For Continuous Testing Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration tools ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 544 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: LambdaTest - **Location**: San Francisco, US - **Founded**: 2017 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$15.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: Lifetime: Free for 1 parallel test Live: $19/month (billed monthly) or $15/month (billed annually) for 1 parallel test, increasing per parallel test up to $475/month (billed monthly) or $175/month (billed annually) for 25 parallel tests. Real Device: $35/month (billed monthly) or $25/month (billed annually) for 1 parallel test, increasing per parallel test up to $625/month (billed monthly) or $500/month (billed annually) for 25 parallel tests. Large organizations requiring more than 25 parallel tests should contact LambdaTest directly for a custom quote. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Bulgaria, Canada, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic and 43 more ## Features - API - Activity Dashboard - Activity Tracking - Agile Methodologies - Alerts/Notifications - Assessment Management - Assignment Management - Audit Trail - Backlog Management - Bug Tracking - Bug/Issue Capture - Collaboration Tools - Configurable Workflow - Cross Browser Testing - Customizable Fields - Customizable Reports - Data Visualization - Debugging - Issue Management - Mobile Testing ## Integrations (15 total) - Asana - Bitbucket - CircleCI - GitHub - GitLab - Hive - Jira - MantisBT - Microsoft Visual Studio - Paymo - Slack - Teamwork.com - Trello - WordPress - monday.com ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) ## Category - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.getapp.sg/directory/389/testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.getapp.sg/directory/389/testing/software) - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.getapp.sg/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Performance Testing Tools](https://www.getapp.sg/directory/1299/performance-testing/software) ## Alternatives 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.getapp.sg/software/170655/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (774 reviews) 2. [ACCELQ](https://www.getapp.sg/software/111257/accelq) — 4.9/5 (135 reviews) 3. [PFLB](https://www.getapp.sg/software/2078160/pflb) — 5.0/5 (44 reviews) 4. [QA Wolf](https://www.getapp.sg/software/2047371/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (69 reviews) 5. [testomat.io](https://www.getapp.sg/software/2061099/testomatio) — 4.8/5 (22 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Regression and Cross Browser Testing" — 4.0/5 > **Rodgers** | *12 January 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: I use LambdaTest frequently for both regression and cross browser testing, and it has genuinely simplified my day to day work. Launching different browser and OS combinations is fast, and it’s a big plus that I no longer need to manage a separate device lab or multiple virtual machines. Overall performance is reliable, and running tests in parallel has noticeably reduced our execution time during busy sprint periods. > > **Cons**: The interface, however, can sometimes feel a little busy, particularly when trying to sift through logs or older session records. I’ve also run into a few instances where test sessions were slightly sluggish, which can be annoying when dealing with timing sensitive defects. With smoother navigation and more flexible, configurable reporting screens, it would align even more naturally with my QA workflow. > > Overall performance is reliable, and running tests in parallel has noticeably reduced our execution time during busy sprint periods. I definitely would recommend the tool. ----- ### "Must have for front end website testing" — 5.0/5 > **Lauren** | *28 January 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Being able to test sites in all browsers straight from my own browser. I no longer need to have lots of different test devices and computers. Being able to generate screenshots to provide to clients of various breakpoints is also a great feature. The chrome extension for accessibility testing is great it's more useful than some of the other tools I have tried as it's pick up on more and you can inspect the page to see exactly what element it is flagging, with the A rating. There have also been other useful features I have needed in the past like local testing and tunnelling that I have been able to do with other platforms. The screen recording feature for sending to clients or agencies. > > **Cons**: Not found anything I don't like yet, they keep adding useful features. > > I've been using them for a few years now as a professional front end developer and have also recommended them to other agencies. I've only used support once but they were very helpful so my overall experience has been very positive. ----- ### "Good tool for manual testing" — 3.0/5 > **Somesh** | *24 April 2025* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: I’ve used it across different devices – from mobile to various browsers and operating systems – and it supports most of the devices we use. > > **Cons**: It is very slow making it difficult to use. > > Overall, LambdaTest is good for testing individual elements. As a tester, I find it useful for verifying UI components across different browsers. However, every time I use it, the performance is noticeably slow compared to real devices. For full end-to-end testing, it becomes frustrating and time-consuming. ----- ### "TestMU AI Review" — 5.0/5 > **Aastha** | *26 February 2026* | Market Research | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Excellent support for testing across a wide range of devices and browsers, making cross-platform checks easy. Helps catch compatibility issues early by letting you run the same link on different environments. Saves time compared to maintaining your own device lab. Simple and intuitive interface — tests are easy to set up and run. Reliable cloud-based access means the team can test from anywhere without hardware constraints. > > **Cons**: Can feel overwhelming at first due to the number of options available. Test results can sometimes feel delayed under heavy load times (depends on plan/parallel sessions). > > TestMU AI has been super helpful for our QA process. Their wide support for multiple devices and browsers lets us quickly check our links across different environments without any hassle. It saves us time, catches issues early, and makes our testing way more reliable. ----- ### "No brainer compared to BrowserStack" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas** | *17 February 2025* | Professional Training & Coaching | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Improvements come thick and fast. The support is incredible. It just works :) > > **Cons**: No real issues at all. Would always like things to be cheaper but can't complain as it's competitive. > > Onboarding are great. Sales team aren't annoying like BrowserStack. Would recommend to anyone. ----- Page: 1 / 23\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.sg/software/111387/lambdatest?page=2) ## Links - [View on GetApp](https://www.getapp.sg/software/111387/lambdatest) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Structured Data